|
"But I thought the New River was clean!"
This is the kind of reaction you’re likely to get when you bring up
the subject of environmental quality and the New River. It’s not broken,
so does it really need fixing?
A look at the current data from the Department of Environmental Quality
and the Environmental Protection Agency supports this view. According to
the EPA web site, the Upper New River has a rating of 1, the highest
rating on a scale of 1-6, indicating "Better Quality" and
"Low Vulnerability" to "stressors such as pollutant
loadings." While the overall impairment of Virginia’s waterways has
risen 240% since 1996 to a figure between 40 and 50%, only 79.14 miles of
the New River Basin, which includes all the streams and tributaries that
empty into the New River, are considered impaired. And half these
impairments are concentrated on four creeks, Chestnut, Back, Peak, and
Crab. Less than three miles of the New River itself show up as impaired on
DEQ environmental reports.
But experts from just about any group concerned with the health of the
New River will tell you that this good news is no reason for complacency.
Real threats to the water quality of the New River exist, and their
sources are not always the more obvious ones that we associate with water
pollution. The river may not be in need of a major fix right now, but a
strong regimen of preventive maintenance is required to keep it that way.
The most prevalent type of contamination threatening the New River
today is nonpoint source pollution. In contrast to point source pollution
where a single, identifiable
source of pollution (such as chemical dumping) can be located,
nonpoint
source pollution is the more broad-scale seepage
of sediment, storm run-off, and agricultural run-off into streams and
rivers. Chemical fertilizers, pesticides, animal waste, and road de-icers
all contribute to nonpoint source pollution.
Waterways struggling against nonpoint source pollution show up on DEQ
reports as contaminated with fecal coliform (a result of animal waste) or
as benthic, which means that the population levels of their bottom
dwelling macroinvertebrates are being effected by an unspecified source.
This type of pollution is hard to correct, in large part because its
sources are so difficult to track. According to the DEQ, agricultural
run-off is the main source of impairment for six of the eleven impaired
sites in the New River watershed.

image credit: "State of Our Rivers Report."
Friends of the Rivers of Virginia. Jan 2001, pg. 16
In addition to the known impairments to the New River Basin, many
experts believe that the current monitoring and reporting of water
quality
data on the New River does not provide a true
picture. They say more monitoring is needed. Among these people are EPA
environmental scientist Mark Barath and Vic Marcussen, an environmental
manager for the Virginia Department of Health. Marcussen told the Roanoke
Times, "I
could take you to a place on Claytor Lake and take two samples in a
24-hour period. One would be drinking-water quality, one would be pure
sewer."
The Clean Water Act contains two provisions that, if used aggressively,
can effectively prevent the water quality of the New River from
deteriorating. The Maximum Daily Load provision generates pollution
emission limits for both point and nonpoint source pollution. The Tier III
system allows waterways with excellent
water quality to earn Tier III designation, which prohibits any new uses
that will permanently lower their water
quality.
A number of organizations throughout the New River Basin are dedicated
to the conservation of the New River. In addition to government
organizations such as the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of
Environmental Quality, and Department of Conservation and Recreation,
groups such as New River Community Partners, Friends of the Rivers of
Virginia, The National Committee for the New River, and the Friends of
Claytor Lake participate in various initiatives to preserve the integrity
of the watershed (see links). But with so many people monitoring the river’s
health and planning conservation projects, communication between groups
has been a problem. Two initiatives, one close to being completed and one
in the planning stages, may remedy this problem. The first, called
"Gateway," has the goal of creating a single web site that can
link the public to a broad range of organizations and web sites about the
New River. Through this web site organizations will have access to the
activities of other organizations and share important information. This
site, expected to go up by the end of 2001, would link to the DEQ and EPA
web sites in order to make their reports more accessible.

image credit: National Geographic, vol. 195,
no 6, June 1999, pg 136
The second initiative is the creation of the New River Watershed
Conservation Roundtable, composed of all organizations who identify
themselves as stakeholders in the protection of the New River. According
to Charlotte Burnett of the Department of Conservation and Recreation, the
first job of the NRWCR would be to develop a long term strategic plan for
the New River that focuses specifically on protecting water quality.
Groups from West Virginia and North Carolina have been invited to
participate in the hopes that all three states can have plans that share
common goals and formats.
Increased monitoring, better communication, and more efficient use of
the provisions of the Clean Water Act have the potential to ensure that
the New River continues
to receive a clean bill of health. Many of these activities, however,
depend on continued state financing in a time when the budgets of
environmental protection agencies are being cut. New initiatives such as
the Gateway web site and the Conservation Roundtable already rely solely
on volunteer hours for their very
existence. Continuing these projects will
require extensive citizen support and an ongoing commitment from the
state.
One only has to glance over the State of Our Rivers Report,
published by the Friends of Virginia Rivers, to be impressed by the
contrast between the New River and seriously impaired rivers such as the
Staunton and Roanoke. Unlike some 40% of Virginia’s waterways, the New
River is not in need of a drastic fix. If we truly understand what a
blessing this is to our quality of life and that of our children, we’ll
support the efforts that are necessary to keep it that way.
For more information contact:
Department of Environmental
Quality
Environmental Protection Agency National Heritage
Rivers
Environmental Protection
Agency
"The New River." The Roanoke Times
The National Committee for the New
River
Virginia
Department of Recreation and Concervation
Patrick N. Woodie
Executive Director , New River Community Partners
PO Box 1897
45 North Main Street
Sparta, NC 28675
336-372-8118
pwoodie@skybest.com
www.nrcp.org
Friends of the Rivers of Virginia
PO Box 1750
Roanoke, VA 24008
540-343-3693
Charlotte Burnett
Department of Conservation and Recreation
Dublin, VA 24084
540-643-2590
vcb@dcr.state.va.us
|